Jun 202012
 

Some excellent posts on Google+ from +Eli Fennell and +Christian Schlobach are very insightful and in itself a nice showcase of a “Long conversation” on Google+. Even including the different approaches of referencing and sharing!

Funny enough, this conversation immediately reminded me of Sherry Turkle. I read her books “The Second Self” (1984) and “Life on the Screen” (1995) when they got published decades ago.
http://www.mit.edu/~sturkle/

Just discovered her newest book “Alone Together” (2011) which is about … social networks.
http://alonetogetherbook.com/

I do not see her on Google+ – yet?! I would much more like to circle her than+George Takei 😉

[Originally posted on Google+]

by - [-]
Rank/Rating: -/-
Price: -

by - [-]
Rank/Rating: -/-
Price: -

by - [-]
Rank/Rating: -/-
Price: -

Sep 292011
 

This little article should make you thinking a bit about privacy data. And some more food for thought:

– Europeans have rights about their privacy data that U.S. does not give their citizens.
– Privacy data hosted in the U.S. is not safe.
– Even privacy data hosted in Europe by an U.S. company may not be safe – due to U.S. Patriot Act
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/igeneration/microsoft-admits-patriot-act-can-access-eu-based-cloud-data/11225
– U.S. companies may soon get excluded from bids in Europe
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-13/deutsche-telekom-wants-german-cloud-to-shield-data-from-u-s-.html
– European companies promote safe clouds – shielding from U.S. Patriot Act
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-13/deutsche-telekom-wants-german-cloud-to-shield-data-from-u-s-.html
– XING, as LinkedIn competitor, is based in Germany and clearly advertises this advantage: “XING protects your privacy.”
http://corporate.xing.com/english/company/security-at-xing/what-we-do/

So next time, you want to share private data with others, choose your social network wisely. You find my XING profile listed together with Twitter and LinkedIn on my Google+ profile. (I am not affiliated in any way with XING.)
https://www.xing.com/profile/Michael_Friess

Happy Networking!

[Originally posted on Google+]

Jul 162011
 

As you start playing with Google+ and Circles, here are a few guidelines for different tastes.

If you want to understand Circles and some of the not so obvious implications, these are good reads:

Jul 152011
 

The most profound concept in Google+ is Circles. And it is probably the most discussed one right now.

  • “But there’s one towering, brilliant difference: Circles”, New York Times
  • “Forget being friended on Facebook or followed on Twitter. What you really want now is to be Circled—or so Google hopes.”, Wall Street Journal
  • “Die Circle-Funktion ist nicht originell – aber ungeheuer praktisch und einfach zu benutzen” Spiegel Online
  • and even on e-cards.

To understand this it is best to step back and look how people use the existing social networks.

For example, I actively use TwitterXINGLinkedIn and Facebook. I use them for different purposes and therefore connect with different people.

  • XING – “The Professional Business Network with More Than 10 Million Members Worldwide”
    I use XING as professional network and to stay in contact. I connect with people from business, school and university and a few family members. I share my contact details and professional profile. I also like the capabilities around groups and event.
    XING is strong in (Continental) Europe and in my opinion it is biggest asset is their focus on security.
  • LinkedIn – “Over 100 million professionals use LinkedIn to exchange information, ideas and opportunities”
    I use LinkedIn similar to XING as a professional network and to stay in contact. I connect with business people (primarily colleagues) and a few family members and friends. I share my professional profile. That’s it. I have not yet found groups very appealing.
    LinkedIn is strong in North America and United Kingdom.
  • Twitter – “Twitter is a real-time information network that connects you to the latest information about what you find interesting”
    I use Twitter to quickly read and share interesting information, primarily business focused. As such I consider it like a news channel, so all sharing is public. I follow colleagues and people who share useful information. I do not use more sophisticated tools like lists.
    Twitter is estimated to have “around 200 million users“.
  • Facebook – “Facebook helps you connect and share with the people in your life.”
    I use Facebook to connect with family and close friends. I primarily read and comment. I share about my interests and little about my private life. I am wary about how Facebook as well as the plethora of apps handle privacy. I block shares from particular apps, cautious about spam bombs (“I can see who stalked me on Facebook with this app …”). I dislike any kind of chain letters (“If you do not share this with everybody, the world will come to an end …”).
    “More than 750 million active users” are on Facebook according to their statistics.

It is not just that I have different interest groups. It is different things to share, different ways to share and different relevance of other resources (contacts, events, music) to access and share. Then I might like to share somethings with multiple groups. Or with those following me as well as with a few selected friends. Then public sharing has different mechanics, it is about following and not friending.

In addition sharing must include those who are not part of the social network. You can directly share to e-mails. By the way, a “Google+ Invite” is just that. You can even put e-mails into Google+ circles!

Google+ circles makes it possible to map the concept of interest groups. It is based on asymmetric “following” and supports public and “limited” sharing. It has the foundation to address all scenarios public, business, personal, private – at least over time.

Multiple social networks take significant effort to manage accounts, setups, contacts and fiddle with tools (desktop, phone, tablet) and their pitfalls.

That is what makes a single, comprehensive social network for all scenarios so compelling. That is the potential of Google+.

Obviously this puts a lot of power into the “holder” of the circles. We will see how Google will play this.

“One to rule them all, One to find them, One to bring them all and in the network bind them”

Nov 182007
 

Kaioo starts as a new social networking platform like Facebook, MySpaces and StudiVZ. Unlike these it is provided by a Non-Governmental Organisation (NGO) with the intention to donor revenue from advertisement to charity organisations. Beneficiaries are suggested and voted for by the community members.

The platform is still in beta and needs quite some polishing. Nevertheless the idea is compelling and worth to support.

Related Links

Aug 112007
 

“The Tipping Point” is about how ideas, products or viewpoints suddenly become popular and cultures can change very quickly. Malcolm Gladwell compares these processes to epidemics and discusses the relevant factors for them to spread. Among others he identifies three relevant roles that participate in the process: mavens, connectors and salesmen.

The book is an easy read and the examples very enlightening – stickyness of Sesame Street or the drop in crime rate in New York.

I expect the whole topic is most popular in marketing and sell new products. Though it is much more important to leverage this kind of insights for spreading wisdom among people. I see a lot of potentials when these concepts are applied to nowawadays communication infrastructure. For example, to identify, facilitate and leverage the three mentioned roles in social networking systems.

by - [-]
Price: - - - -

Related Links